waterfalls
What should be checked before running a distribution waterfall?
The team should check proceeds, capital accounts, return thresholds, preferred return, catch-up terms, reserves, fees, expenses, and document language.
A waterfall calculation is only reliable when the inputs and legal interpretation are controlled before cash is allocated. For sponsors, LP finance teams, administrators, and counsel reviewing distribution economics, the practical answer is to treat the question as part of distribution modeling, return thresholds, preferred return, catch-up, promote, reserves, true-up, and clawback review, not as a one-off definition. The record should show the governing agreement, proceeds schedule, capital accounts, waterfall model, reserve analysis, distribution notice, and approval record so an investor, lender, counsel, administrator, or operating lead can reconstruct the decision later. Tie the model to the latest capital accounts, realized proceeds, unpaid expenses, reserves, and the exact distribution sequence in the agreement. The common failure mode is running a spreadsheet from stale balances or shorthand economics that do not match the signed documents.
Related glossary terms
Related questions
How should sponsors explain a preferred return in investor materials?
They should explain the rate, compounding method, accrual period, payment priority, catch-up interaction, and whether unpaid amounts carry forward.
What is the difference between a catch-up and a promote split?
A catch-up reallocates distributions after the preferred return so the sponsor reaches an agreed share, while the promote split governs residual upside after that tier.
When should a waterfall model include a clawback reserve?
It should include one when interim distributions could overpay sponsor carry before final performance, expenses, taxes, or future losses are known.