Skip to main content
@VCBeastmediaNewsletter
VC Beast

2026 Comparison

LP Reporting Software for Private Funds, Compared

For the GP, CFO or IR lead producing quarterly LP reports and capital account statements. Published prices only, feature cells from each vendor’s own pages, and what 100 venture firms were observed running.

Written by Michael Kaufman · Reviewed against our editorial standards · Updated

Quick Answer

LP reporting software produces quarterly reports, capital account statements and notices from fund records and delivers them through an investor portal. Institutional GPs mostly run Allvue (AltaReturn), eFront, Juniper Square, Dynamo or Intralinks; emerging venture managers use Carta, Visible, Standard Metrics or an administrator's portal. Our pick for emerging managers is Archstone, our own product, at a published $297/mo.

29 / 100

VC Tech 100 firms with an identifiable LP portal

Most often observed

  • Allvue (AltaReturn) 5
  • eFront 3
  • Intralinks 3

Counts of firms, not market share. Method.

Looking for how LP reporting works rather than which software to buy? Read the full quarterly LP reporting guide.

What Firms Actually Use

29 of the 100 venture firms in the VC Tech 100 run an identifiable LP portal. Most common: Allvue (AltaReturn) (5), eFront (3), Intralinks (3).

The figures come from the LP-reporting column of the VC Tech 100, our evidence pass over a fixed panel of 100 venture firms. Most identifications come from resolving the firm’s investor-login subdomain to the vendor that hosts it; the rest from vendor customer pages and job posts. 5 are confirmed and 24 inferred. 18 more firms show LP reporting without a named platform, 52 were checked and named nothing, and 1 has not been reviewed yet. Of the identified portals, 5 name a tool outside the list below, including custom builds, and 1 names no tool at all.

LP portal vendors observed across the VC Tech 100 panel, by number of firms.
Platform observedFirms
Allvue (AltaReturn)5
eFront3
Intralinks3
Altvia2
FIS Data Exchange2
FundPanel2
Juniper Square2
DocSend1
Dynamo1
InvestorFlow1
Passthrough1

Column generated September 21, 2026. Observed, not market share: a portal on a subdomain shows the tool exists, not how much of the reporting runs through it. We publish counts only and do not name which firm runs which platform.

13 Platforms Compared

Our pick first, labelled as ours; the other twelve follow in no ranked order. “Not stated” means the vendor pages we checked do not say, not that the feature is absent. “Partial” means the portal delivers statements produced elsewhere.

LP reporting software compared on parent, side, best fit, published price, capital accounts, ILPA support, investor portal, bundled fund administration and Tech 100 observations.
PlatformParentSideBest forPublished priceCapital accounts and noticesILPA (vendor-stated)Investor portalFund admin bundledTech 100 firmsChecked
ArchstoneOur pick (our product)Shares ownership with VC BeastGPEmerging VC and sponsor funds$297/mo Starter, $497/mo ProYesStated for PE workflowsYesNo02026-10-02
Juniper SquareNone statedGPReal estate and multi-fund PEQuote-basedYesILPA-compliant capital call noticesYesYes22026-10-02
Allvue (AltaReturn)Allvue SystemsGPMulti-fund PE and creditQuote-basedYesNot stated on pages checkedYesNo52026-10-02
eFrontBlackRockGP and LPMulti-fund PE; LPsQuote-basedNot statedNot stated on pages checkedYesNo32026-10-02
DynamoNone statedGPMulti-fund PEQuote-basedNot statedNot stated on pages checkedYesYes12026-10-02
AltviaNone statedGPPE, VC and fund-of-funds IR teamsQuote-basedNot statedNot stated on pages checkedYesNo22026-10-02
Intralinks FundCentreSS&CGPMulti-fund PEQuote-basedNot statedBuilt-in ILPA templatesYesNo32026-10-02
CartaNone statedGPEmerging VC already on CartaQuote-basedNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedYes02026-10-02
VisibleNone statedGPVC funds where portfolio data is the bottleneckQuote-basedNoNot stated on pages checkedNoNo02026-10-02
Standard MetricsNone statedGPVC and PE portfolio data teamsQuote-basedNoNot stated on pages checkedNoNo02026-10-02
AgoraNone statedGPReal estateFrom $749/mo (Essential)YesStandardized ILPA noticesYesNo02026-10-02
InvestorFlowNone statedGPMulti-fund PE (CRM-led IR)Quote-basedPartialNot stated on pages checkedYesNo12026-10-02
ChronographNone statedGP and LPLPs; PE GPsQuote-basedNot statedNot stated on pages checkedNot statedNo02026-10-02

Prices checked October 2, 2026 on each vendor’s own site; a vendor that publishes no rate is “Quote-based” and nothing is estimated. Also considered and dropped: Cobalt (cobaltlp.com now redirects to Hamilton Lane's technology page); Kushim (kushim.io did not resolve on the check date).

Shortlist by fund type

Which platforms to shortlist, by type of fund.
If you areShortlist
Emerging venture manager, first or second fundOur pick, named above. Already on Carta for fund administration: ask what Carta's reporting adds first. Portfolio data is the late part: Visible or Standard Metrics alongside your administrator.
Multi-fund private equity, accounting in-houseAllvue (AltaReturn) or eFront, where the portal reads directly from fund accounting. Dynamo if you want CRM, portal and accounting on one data model.
Multi-fund private equity, administrator keeps the booksA delivery portal over the administrator's output: Intralinks FundCentre, InvestorFlow or Altvia, chosen by whether IR runs from a CRM.
Real estate sponsorJuniper Square or Agora. Agora publishes its entry price; Juniper Square bundles fund administration if you want one vendor.
LP or allocatoreFront or Chronograph for analytics across managers, plus a document-ingestion tool. See the LP section below.

Why Archstone Is Our Pick for Emerging Managers

Archstone is our own product, so weigh this section accordingly. It is the pick for a first or second venture or sponsor fund because it covers the whole quarterly loop at a published price: per-LP capital accounts with drawdown history, capital call and distribution notices, a branded LP portal, a quarterly report builder and drafted LP letters, on Starter at $297 a month (up to 25 LPs and 2 funds) or Pro at $497 a month (unlimited LPs, 3 funds), with no per-seat fees. K-1s are collected and distributed through the portal; your CPA still prepares them.

What it is not: a fund administrator, and not a platform any panel firm was observed running. Firms with institutional LP bases and in-house accounting are better served by the fund accounting suites in the table. Head-to-heads: Archstone vs Juniper Square, Archstone vs Allvue, Archstone vs Carta.

See Archstone’s pricing →

How the Quarterly LP Reporting Process Works

Software helps at different steps, so know the steps before comparing tools. Every quarter runs the same four, whoever does the work.

  1. 1

    Close and reconcile. The quarter starts in the general ledger, not the report. Bank and custody balances are reconciled, capital calls and distributions are booked against each LP's commitment, and management fees and fund expenses are accrued and allocated. If an administrator keeps the books, this is their deliverable and your job is review. Every number downstream inherits whatever this step got wrong, which is why software that only formats the report rarely shortens the quarter.

  2. 2

    Compute performance. From the closed books come the fund-level figures LPs compare across managers: net IRR, TVPI, DPI and RVPI, on a stated methodology that does not change from quarter to quarter. Portfolio valuations are marked under the fund's valuation policy, and each LP's capital account is rolled forward: opening balance, contributions, distributions, allocated income and expense, unrealized gain or loss, closing balance. This is the step where a spreadsheet stops being safe, because one broken link changes every LP's statement at once.

  3. 3

    Draft the narrative. The GP letter explains what changed and why: new investments, follow-ons, exits, write-downs and the outlook. Each portfolio company gets a short update, ideally from metrics the company reported to you rather than numbers retyped from a board deck. This is where portfolio monitoring tools earn their place, and where AI drafting helps most, provided a partner owns every sentence that goes out.

  4. 4

    Deliver and archive. The package goes out through an investor portal rather than email attachments: the quarterly report, one capital account statement per LP, and any notices issued in the period, each permissioned to the right investor and kept for the life of the fund. Annual audited financials and tax documents follow on their own calendar. A portal also answers the question LPs ask most between quarters, which is where their own documents are.

Definitions for the figures above: capital account statement, TVPI, DPI. Notices follow their own workflow, covered in the capital call process.

ILPA Templates in 2026

ILPA released an updated Reporting Template and a new Performance Template in January 2025, then refreshed its Capital Call and Distribution Template later in 2025 to align with both. The templates supplement a GP’s standard quarterly package rather than replace it. They are not legally required: ILPA describes endorsement as aspirational alignment rather than a rigid obligation, though institutional LPs increasingly ask for them.

Three vendors in the table state ILPA support on the pages we checked: Intralinks FundCentre (built-in, standardized ILPA templates), Juniper Square (ILPA-compliant capital call notices) and Agora (standardized ILPA notices). Note the difference: notice formatting is not the same as producing the Reporting or Performance Template. If ILPA output matters to your LPs, ask for a sample report in the template, not a feature checkbox. Source: ILPA Templates Hub, checked October 2, 2026.

The Twelve Platforms, One by One

Juniper Square

Quote-based

GP · Real estate and multi-fund PE · observed at 2 Tech 100 firms

Investor portal, investor CRM and reporting in one product, with its own fund administration service sold alongside the software. Its reporting page states statements and notices for NAV, capital accounts, ILPA-compliant capital calls and management fees. The fit is a GP that wants software and administration from one vendor and has the LP base to justify an institutional implementation. Ask which modules the quote assumes, and whether reporting is priced separately from administration.

Source: junipersquare.com/finance-and-reporting/investor-reporting, checked 2026-10-02.

Allvue (AltaReturn)

Quote-based

GP · Multi-fund PE and credit · observed at 5 Tech 100 firms

Often still seen under its older AltaReturn name on LP portal subdomains. The investor portal delivers investor reports, capital account statements, K-1s and capital call notices, and draws them straight from Allvue's fund accounting module, so the statement an LP downloads is the one accounting produced. It is built for firms, and the administrators serving them, that run accounting in-house on Allvue. Without that accounting layer, most of the reason to buy it goes away.

Source: allvuesystems.com/solutions/investor-portal, checked 2026-10-02.

eFront

Quote-based

GP and LP · Multi-fund PE; LPs · observed at 3 Tech 100 firms

BlackRock's private-markets platform, covering fundraising, fund administration and accounting software, investor portals and LP-side portfolio analytics. It is one of the few products here sold to both sides of the table, which matters if your largest LPs already run eFront and want your data in a shape it ingests. Expect an enterprise implementation. For a single venture fund it is more system than the job needs.

Source: efront.com/en/alternative-investment-solutions/alternative-investment-portals, checked 2026-10-02.

Dynamo

Quote-based

GP · Multi-fund PE · observed at 1 Tech 100 firm

A private-markets suite whose product list runs from CRM and deal management through investor relations, an investor portal, portfolio monitoring, fund accounting and a fund administration service. The appeal is one data model from fundraising through reporting. The cost is configuration: Dynamo is a platform you shape to your process, so budget implementation time and an internal owner.

Source: dynamosoftware.com, checked 2026-10-02.

Altvia

Quote-based

GP · PE, VC and fund-of-funds IR teams · observed at 2 Tech 100 firms

CRM, a virtual data room with an LP portal, and analytics, sold to private equity, venture, fund-of-funds and real estate managers. Altvia is strongest where investor relations is a CRM job first: the LP who was a prospect in the raise is the same record that receives the quarterly report. The pages we checked do not state capital account statement production, so plan for statements to come from your administrator and be delivered through the portal.

Source: altvia.com, checked 2026-10-02.

Intralinks FundCentre

Quote-based

GP · Multi-fund PE · observed at 3 Tech 100 firms

SS&C's investor portal for alternative funds. The product page states customizable portal branding, reporting integrations and built-in, standardized ILPA templates. It is a delivery layer: secure, branded distribution of documents your administrator or accounting team produces, with ILPA formatting stated for the reports themselves.

Source: intralinks.com/products/fundcentre, checked 2026-10-02.

Carta

Quote-based

GP · Emerging VC already on Carta

Carta sells fund administration, and LP reporting arrives as part of that engagement rather than as a separate product. Carta's site refused our fetches on the check date, so the feature cells in its row are marked not verified rather than carried over from an older read. The practical test is simple: if your fund administration already runs on Carta, ask what its LP reporting adds before buying a second tool; if it does not, Carta is a fund admin decision, not a reporting one.

Source: carta.com/fund-management, checked 2026-10-02.

Visible

Quote-based

GP · VC funds where portfolio data is the bottleneck

Portfolio monitoring for venture firms: collecting metrics from portfolio companies, dashboards, and reports to keep LPs up to date. Its investor plans (Essential, Premium, Enterprise) are all custom-priced; the published monthly prices on Visible's site are founder plans, not fund plans. There are tear sheets and a data room, but no capital account statements, so it pairs with an administrator rather than replacing one.

Source: visible.vc/investor-pricing, checked 2026-10-02.

Standard Metrics

Quote-based

GP · VC and PE portfolio data teams

Portfolio data collection and analysis that feeds portfolio reviews, valuations and LP reporting, priced by demo. Like Visible, it owns the portfolio half of the LP report: the company metrics and commentary. Capital accounts and notices come from your administrator. Choose it when chasing portfolio companies for numbers is what makes the quarter late.

Source: standardmetrics.io, checked 2026-10-02.

Agora

From $749/mo (Essential)

GP · Real estate

Investor management built for real estate sponsors, and one of only two platforms in this comparison with a published entry price. The pricing page lists periodic capital account statements, standardized ILPA notices and a full investor portal on every tier. Its data model assumes properties and deals, which is a strength for real estate and friction for a venture fund.

Source: agorareal.com/pricing, checked 2026-10-02.

InvestorFlow

Quote-based

GP · Multi-fund PE (CRM-led IR) · observed at 1 Tech 100 firm

A private equity CRM with a branded investor portal where LPs view statements, documents and fund insights under granular permissions and audit trails. Statements are delivered, not produced: the capital account still comes from accounting or your administrator. Fit is an IR team running fundraising and reporting from one relationship record.

Source: investorflow.com, checked 2026-10-02.

Chronograph

Quote-based

GP and LP · LPs; PE GPs

Portfolio monitoring and analytics sold separately to LPs and to GPs. On the GP side, customers describe it as one place for data management, valuations and LP reporting workflows; on the LP side it rolls commitments up from portfolio companies to funds and vehicles. It is a data platform first, so pair it with a delivery portal if your LPs expect one.

Source: chronograph.pe, checked 2026-10-02.

One Vehicle, One Report Set: Why Multi-Vehicle Managers Buy Software

Every fund, SPV and parallel vehicle is a separate set of capital accounts and a separate LP report. That, more than LP count, is what breaks a spreadsheet. Across the 276 firms we match to SEC Form D filings, 154 filed two or more new vehicles between September 30, 2024 and September 29, 2026, and 51 filed five or more. A manager in that second group is producing five report sets a quarter, and the case for software is arithmetic rather than taste.

If You Are the LP

Part of this search comes from the other side of the table: allocators choosing tools to read what dozens of GPs send them. The job is different. An LP does not produce statements; it collects them in every format, extracts the numbers and rolls exposure up across managers.

  • Analytics across managers: Chronograph LP rolls commitments up from portfolio companies to funds and vehicles; eFront serves asset owners alongside its GP products.
  • Document ingestion: Canoe connects to GP portals and inboxes and extracts data from capital calls, distribution notices and capital account statements.
  • What to ask your GPs for: statements in a consistent format each quarter, ideally ILPA’s, delivered through a portal with a stable login, which is exactly what the GP-side tools above exist to produce.

What It Costs

Published figures only. 2 of the 13 platforms in this comparison publish a price: our pick (in the table above) and Agora, from $749 a month for its Essential plan. Every other vendor is quote-based, and Visible’s published monthly prices apply to its founder plans, not its fund plans. A quote usually scales with funds, LPs, users and modules; ask which of the four the number assumes, and what the renewal escalator is.

The other cost is the one many managers already pay: reporting bundled into fund administration. In the VC Tech 100, 56 of the 100 firms name a fund administrator in their SEC Form ADV filings, and for those firms the capital account statement is already produced. The question is whether the administrator’s portal and report are good enough, or whether you are paying for a layer on top. For administrator pricing see the fund admin pricing benchmark and fund admin software compared.

How we scored this

We score for GPs and IR leads choosing software to produce and deliver quarterly LP reports, from a first venture fund to a multi-fund PE platform. Platforms built for a different buyer are rated against that lens, where they may intentionally score lower — a statement of fit, not a knock on quality. These are editorial judgments based on public pricing and documented features as of October 2, 2026; they are not paid placements, and no rating reflects aggregated user reviews.

  • 25%

    Statement production

    Whether the platform produces per-LP capital account statements and notices from fund records, or only delivers documents made elsewhere.

  • 20%

    Investor portal

    Self-service LP access to capital accounts, documents and performance, with per-investor permissions.

  • 15%

    Report drafting and data flow

    How much of the quarterly report is assembled from the books and portfolio data without retyping.

  • 10%

    ILPA support

    Vendor-stated support for ILPA reporting, performance or notice templates, checked on the vendor's own page.

  • 15%

    Price transparency

    A published rate, or a quote that names its scaling triggers.

  • 5%

    Observed adoption

    Firms in the VC Tech 100 panel observed running the platform. Context, not a quality score.

  • 10%

    Fit for the buyer

    How well the product matches its stated buyer: emerging VC, multi-fund PE, real estate or LP.

Prices checked October 2, 2026. Updated October 2, 2026. Adoption evidence is the VC Tech 100 LP-reporting column, generated September 21, 2026; we re-check prices monthly and the column quarterly.

Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

What back-office software should a VC firm with $500M AUM be using? We need tools that cover fund accounting, expense allocation, and audit readiness without a large finance team.

At that size most firms split the job: a fund administrator keeps the books, allocates expenses between the fund and the management company and supports the audit, and software sits on top for reporting and the LP portal. If you would rather run accounting in-house, Allvue and eFront connect fund accounting directly to the portal; Dynamo and Juniper Square sell an administration service alongside their software. All four are quote-based. Decide who owns the ledger first; the reporting tool follows from that.

What's the best VC tool for LP reporting?

For an emerging venture manager, the pick on this page is named in the answer box at the top, with our ownership disclosed. Beyond it, the choice turns on where your data starts. If the slow part is collecting numbers from portfolio companies, Visible or Standard Metrics; if your administrator already produces capital accounts, a delivery portal over their output; if fund administration already runs on Carta, start by asking what Carta's reporting adds.

What are the best LP reporting tools for venture capital?

The table on this page compares thirteen. For venture funds specifically, the short list is narrower: Carta for managers already on its fund administration, Visible and Standard Metrics for the portfolio-data half of the report, and a portal that produces or delivers per-LP capital account statements. Ask every vendor two questions in a demo: does it calculate TVPI, DPI and net IRR, and does it produce a capital account statement for each LP.

What tools track capital calls, distributions, and IRR?

Fund accounting systems track them at the source: Allvue, eFront and Dynamo all pair an investor portal with fund accounting, and Juniper Square states statements and notices for capital accounts and ILPA-compliant capital calls. Agora lists capital account statements and ILPA notices on every plan. Portfolio tools such as Visible and Standard Metrics report performance but do not issue calls. The deciding question is whether you issue notices yourself or report on what your administrator processed.

Is there software for portfolio monitoring and LP reporting in one system?

Yes, at both ends of the market. Dynamo and eFront cover portfolio monitoring, fund accounting and an investor portal in one suite, and Chronograph combines monitoring with LP reporting workflows. For lean venture teams, an all-in-one fund operations platform covers both. Two separate tools only pay off when portfolio-company data collection is heavy and the reporting side is simple, which is the case Visible and Standard Metrics are built for.

What are the key LP experience features to compare when evaluating reporting tools?

Compare from the LP's side of the screen: a self-service view of their own capital account, a document archive for reports, K-1s and notices, performance figures available without emailing you, and permissions that stop one LP seeing another's data. Then check delivery: whether notices arrive in a standard format such as ILPA's, and whether the portal can be branded as yours. Institutional LPs treat the portal as a governance requirement; a small LP base mostly needs documents in one place.

What is the best LP reporting software?

For emerging venture and sponsor managers, our pick is Archstone, our own product: per-LP capital accounts, capital call and distribution notices, a branded LP portal and drafted quarterly letters, on published plans of $297 and $497 a month. For multi-fund private equity, Allvue or eFront where accounting is in-house. For real estate, Juniper Square or Agora. Score candidates on statement production, portal quality and how cleanly they take data from your books.

What tools help private market firms measure LP engagement?

Engagement lives in the portal and the CRM, not the report: who opened the quarterly letter, logged in and downloaded documents. Portals such as Intralinks FundCentre, InvestorFlow and Altvia sit next to an investor CRM, so that activity lands on the same record as the relationship. Decide why you are measuring it first. Improving the report is a reporting job; planning a re-up is a CRM job, and the tools look different.

What tools help with VC fund reporting workflows?

A venture reporting workflow has four steps: close the books, compute performance, draft the letter and deliver it. Administrators and fund accounting tools own the first two, portfolio tools such as Visible and Standard Metrics feed the third, and an investor portal owns the fourth. The process section on this page walks through each step. Buy for the step that currently makes your report late, because automating a step you already do well changes nothing.

How often do GPs report to LPs?

Quarterly is the norm for financial reporting, with the report typically following the quarter end by several weeks once the books are closed and valuations marked. Audited financial statements and tax documents follow annually on their own timetable. Notices go out whenever capital is called or distributed. Your limited partnership agreement sets the binding deadlines, so read it before promising LPs a date.

What should a quarterly LP report include?

A GP letter on what changed and why, a fund performance summary (net IRR, TVPI, DPI, RVPI), a schedule of investments with current marks, a short update per portfolio company, a capital account statement for each LP, and the fees and expenses charged in the period. Keep the format and metric definitions the same every quarter; consistency is what lets an LP compare you with yourself.

What is the ILPA reporting template, and is it required?

The Institutional Limited Partners Association publishes standard templates for how GPs present fees, expenses, carried interest and performance. ILPA released an updated Reporting Template and a new Performance Template in January 2025 and refreshed its Capital Call and Distribution Template later that year. Nothing makes them legally required; ILPA describes endorsement as aspirational alignment. In practice, institutional LPs increasingly ask for them, often in side letters.

How much does LP reporting software cost?

Most of this market does not publish a price. Of the thirteen platforms compared here, two publish one: our pick, named above, and Agora, whose Essential plan starts from $749 a month. The other eleven are quote-based, which usually means pricing scales with funds, LPs and modules. Where reporting comes bundled with fund administration, the reporting cost sits inside the administrator's fee.

LP reporting software vs fund administrator: do I need both?

Often, yes, because they do different jobs. The administrator keeps the books, calculates each LP's capital account and supports the audit; the software delivers the result to LPs and, at the more capable end, drafts the report around it. Some vendors sell both. If your administrator already runs a good portal, you may only need a tool for the narrative and portfolio data.

Can AI write LP reports?

AI can draft the narrative well: a first version of the GP letter and portfolio updates from metrics you already hold. It should not be the source of any number. Performance figures and capital accounts must come from the books, and a partner should read and own every sentence before it goes out, because the letter is a statement made to investors.

What's the best reporting tool for tracking capital calls and distributions?

The one that keeps calls and distributions on the same ledger as each LP's capital account, so the statement and the notice cannot disagree. In this comparison that means a fund accounting suite (Allvue, eFront, Dynamo) or a platform that states statements and notices together (Juniper Square, Agora). Ask any vendor to show a per-LP capital account statement before you buy; that document is where tracking either works or does not.

Is VC Beast independent from Archstone?

No. VC Beast and Archstone share common ownership: the same founder operates both. That is why Archstone is labelled as ours everywhere it appears and why the page publishes its rubric, its sources and the date every price was checked. Prices and features for every platform come from the vendor's own pages, and the adoption counts come from the VC Tech 100, which no vendor pays to appear in.

Sources & References

  1. 1.Archstone (shares ownership with VC Beast): pricing and features(Price, portal, capital account and ILPA cells as fetched 2026-10-02)
  2. 2.Juniper Square: product page(Price, portal, capital account and ILPA cells as fetched 2026-10-02)
  3. 3.Allvue (AltaReturn): product page(Price, portal, capital account and ILPA cells as fetched 2026-10-02)
  4. 4.eFront: product page(Price, portal, capital account and ILPA cells as fetched 2026-10-02)
  5. 5.Dynamo: product page(Price, portal, capital account and ILPA cells as fetched 2026-10-02)
  6. 6.Altvia: product page(Price, portal, capital account and ILPA cells as fetched 2026-10-02)
  7. 7.Intralinks FundCentre: product page(Price, portal, capital account and ILPA cells as fetched 2026-10-02)
  8. 8.Carta: product page(Price, portal, capital account and ILPA cells as fetched 2026-10-02)
  9. 9.Visible: product page(Price, portal, capital account and ILPA cells as fetched 2026-10-02)
  10. 10.Standard Metrics: product page(Price, portal, capital account and ILPA cells as fetched 2026-10-02)
  11. 11.Agora: product page(Price, portal, capital account and ILPA cells as fetched 2026-10-02)
  12. 12.InvestorFlow: product page(Price, portal, capital account and ILPA cells as fetched 2026-10-02)
  13. 13.Chronograph: product page(Price, portal, capital account and ILPA cells as fetched 2026-10-02)
  14. 14.Archstone: product overview(Per-LP capital accounts and ILPA reporting statement, fetched 2026-10-02)
  15. 15.Visible: founder pricing(Published monthly prices apply to founder plans, not fund plans)
  16. 16.Canoe Intelligence(Extracts data from capital calls, distribution notices and capital account statements)
  17. 17.Chronograph for Limited Partners(LP-side portfolio monitoring product)
  18. 18.ILPA: Updated ILPA Templates Hub(Updated Reporting Template and new Performance Template released in 2025; Capital Call and Distribution Template refreshed later in 2025)
  19. 19.ILPA: Template Endorsement and Adoption(Templates released January 2025; endorsement is aspirational alignment, not an obligation)
  20. 20.VC Beast: the VC Tech 100, LP-reporting column(Identifiable LP portals across the panel, generated 2026-09-21)
  21. 21.SEC EDGAR: Form D filings, matched to VC Beast firm profiles(New pooled-vehicle filings 2024-09-30 to 2026-09-29)

Terms On This Page

LP reporting is judged on whether these numbers arrive correct, on time, and explained.

Capital Account Statement

a periodic report provided to each LP showing their individual fund position including contributions, distributions…

DPI

distributions to paid-in capital: cash actually returned to investors divided by capital actually called

TVPI

total value to paid-in capital: distributions plus remaining net asset value, divided by capital contributed

RVPI

residual value to paid-in capital: the share of a fund's reported performance that still sits in unsold assets rather…

Investor Update

a periodic report sent by founders to investors summarizing company performance and needs

J-Curve

the shape of a private fund's reported return over time: negative for the first few years, then rising as investments…

LP Advisory Committee (LPAC)

a committee of selected LPs that reviews and approves potential conflicts of interest and other sensitive fund decisions

Limited Partner (LP)

a fund investor in a limited partnership who supplies capital, has no management authority, and is shielded from…

LP Reporting Guide →Portfolio Monitoring Software →Fund Admin Software →The VC Tech 100 Dataset →Capital Call Process →Investor Relations Platforms →