Deal Terms
Full Ratchet
Last updated
Quick Answer
An anti-dilution term that resets a preferred holder's conversion price all the way down to the price of any cheaper later issuance, however small.1
What it is
Full ratchet is the most severe form of price-based anti-dilution protection. In the NVCA model Certificate of Incorporation, the full ratchet alternative to Section 4.4.4 reduces a series' Conversion Price, on any issuance of Additional Shares of Common Stock below that Conversion Price, to the consideration per share the company actually received. Because the reset ignores how many cheap shares were issued, a single share sold at a tenth of the last round price resets the whole series as if it had been bought there. Since each share converts by dividing its Original Issue Price by its Conversion Price, a lower Conversion Price hands the holder proportionally more common stock and pushes the dilution onto everyone without the protection.1,2
In Practice
Hypothetical. Series A buys 4,000,000 shares at $1.00 ($4,000,000) with 6,000,000 common and options outstanding, so 10,000,000 fully diluted. A down round issues 5,000,000 shares at $0.25 ($1,250,000). Under full ratchet the Conversion Price resets to $0.25, so each Series A share converts at $1.00 divided by $0.25, or 4 shares: 16,000,000 common. Fully diluted becomes 6,000,000 plus 16,000,000 plus 5,000,000 = 27,000,000. Series A holds 59.3 percent, common 22.2 percent, the new round 18.5 percent. Under the broad-based weighted average formula CP2 = CP1 x (A + B) / (A + C), with A = 10,000,000, B = $1,250,000 / $1.00 = 1,250,000 and C = 5,000,000, CP2 = 11,250,000 / 15,000,000 = $0.75. Series A would convert into 5,333,333 shares and common would keep 36.7 percent of 16,333,333.
Operational context
What good looks like
The term is tied to a real workflow, not just a definition.
Ownership, timing, and evidence are clear.
The reader can tell what decision the concept supports.
Related terms point to the next useful explanation.
Why It Matters
Full ratchet decides who pays for a down round before anyone has negotiated one. The NVCA charter offers it and broad-based weighted average as alternative versions of the same section, chosen by whatever the term sheet said, so the word in the term sheet is the whole negotiation. In the worked comparison above, the same $1,250,000 down round leaves common with 22.2 percent under a ratchet and 36.7 percent under weighted average. That gap is why a founder should ask for a sunset date, a Qualified Financing carve-out, or a per-share reset floor rather than argue about the principle.1
VC Beast Take
Never accept full ratchet anti-dilution. It's one of the most founder-hostile provisions in venture. Standard market terms use broad-based weighted average anti-dilution, which is far more balanced. Any investor insisting on full ratchet is a red flag worth taking seriously.
What is a ratchet in private equity?
In venture and growth financings a ratchet is price-based anti-dilution: a contractual reset of a preferred series' conversion price when the company later sells stock more cheaply. A full ratchet resets that conversion price all the way down to the new, lower price per share, regardless of how few shares were sold at it.
Where the term actually lives
It is a charter term, not a side agreement. The NVCA Model Certificate of Incorporation, updated October 2025, carries two alternative versions of Section 4.4.4, each preceded by a bracketed drafting instruction telling the drafter which to use. One reads "Use the following Section 4.4.4 if the terms sheet calls for a broad-based weighted average anti-dilution provision." The other reads "Use the following Section 4.4.4 if the term sheet calls for a full ratchet anti-dilution provision." The charter is downstream of the term sheet; whichever word appeared there is what gets filed in Delaware.
The full ratchet version says that if the company issues Additional Shares of Common Stock without consideration or for a consideration per share less than the Conversion Price of a series in effect immediately before the issuance, then that Conversion Price "shall be reduced, concurrently with such issuance or deemed issuance, to the consideration per share received by the Corporation for such issue or deemed issue of the Additional Shares of Common Stock." If the issuance was for no consideration at all, the charter deems the company to have received an aggregate of $0.001.
Two bracketed options in that same paragraph are the ones worth fighting for. The clause opens "In the event the Corporation at any time after the Original Issue Date [and prior to [Date]]" — that bracket is the sunset, after which the ratchet stops applying. And Section 4.4.2 lets the protection be waived: no adjustment is made if the company receives written notice from the Requisite Holders, or from the holders of a majority of the series, agreeing that none should be made.
How the reset turns into shares
Conversion Price is not the number of shares. Section 4.1.1 says each share of Preferred Stock converts into the number of shares of Common Stock determined by dividing the applicable Original Issue Price by the applicable Conversion Price. The Original Issue Price is fixed at closing. So halving the Conversion Price doubles the conversion ratio, quartering it quadruples it, and the extra shares come out of everyone else's percentage.
Two definitions control how often the trigger fires. Additional Shares of Common Stock means everything issued after the Original Issue Date other than the Exempted Securities, and the charter's exempted list covers the employee plan, shares actually issued on exercise or conversion of previously counted options and convertible securities, shares issued in a firm underwritten public offering, and bracketed carve-outs for equipment lessors and lenders, suppliers and service providers, acquisition consideration and strategic partnerships. Section 4.4.3 then deems options and convertible securities to be issued when granted, at the maximum number of underlying shares, so a cheap option grant or a low-cap convertible can trip a ratchet before any stock is sold.
One drafting detail saves companies real money: the Multiple Closing Dates provision readjusts the Conversion Price to treat all the issuances in a single transaction or series of related transactions, occurring within a bracketed window of no more than 180 days, as if they had happened on the date of the first issuance, without additional adjustments for the later ones. Without that, a tranched down round can ratchet more than once.
Worked example, arithmetic shown
All figures are hypothetical.
Starting point. Series A buys 4,000,000 shares at $1.00 per share, investing $4,000,000. Original Issue Price and initial Conversion Price are both $1.00. Common stock and options outstanding are 6,000,000 shares. Fully diluted is 6,000,000 + 4,000,000 = 10,000,000 shares, so Series A holds 40.0 percent.
The down round. The company sells 5,000,000 new shares at $0.25 per share, raising $1,250,000. The new price is below the $1.00 Conversion Price, so Section 4.4.4 fires.
Full ratchet result.
- New Conversion Price equals the consideration per share received: $0.25.
- Conversion ratio: $1.00 Original Issue Price divided by $0.25 Conversion Price = 4.0 shares per preferred share.
- Series A as converted: 4,000,000 x 4.0 = 16,000,000 shares.
- Fully diluted after the round: 6,000,000 + 16,000,000 + 5,000,000 = 27,000,000 shares.
- Series A: 16,000,000 / 27,000,000 = 59.3 percent. Common and options: 6,000,000 / 27,000,000 = 22.2 percent. New round: 5,000,000 / 27,000,000 = 18.5 percent. Those three add to 100.0 percent.
Broad-based weighted average on the same facts. The formula in the alternative Section 4.4.4 is CP2 = CP1 x (A + B) / (A + C), where A is the fully diluted shares outstanding immediately before the issuance, B is the number of shares that would have been issued if the new money had come in at CP1, and C is the number of Additional Shares actually issued.
- A = 10,000,000.
- B = aggregate consideration divided by CP1 = $1,250,000 / $1.00 = 1,250,000.
- C = 5,000,000.
- CP2 = $1.00 x (10,000,000 + 1,250,000) / (10,000,000 + 5,000,000) = $1.00 x 11,250,000 / 15,000,000 = $0.75.
- Series A as converted: 4,000,000 x ($1.00 / $0.75) = 5,333,333 shares.
- Fully diluted: 6,000,000 + 5,333,333 + 5,000,000 = 16,333,333 shares.
- Series A: 32.7 percent. Common and options: 36.7 percent. New round: 30.6 percent.
Read the two side by side. The same $1,250,000 issuance costs common 14.5 percentage points more under the ratchet (36.7 versus 22.2), and it also costs the incoming investor 12.1 points (30.6 versus 18.5). A ratchet on the cap table is not only a founder problem; it is the reason the next investor may refuse to fund at all until it is removed.
How it shows up in documents
The ratchet sits in Article Fourth of the Certificate of Incorporation, inside the Conversion section, because it changes a stock right and therefore has to be in the charter. Neighbors to read at the same time: Section 4.4.2, the holder waiver; Section 4.4.3, the deemed-issuance machinery for options and convertible securities; Section 4.4.5, which tells you how consideration is computed for non-cash issuances; and, if the term sheet also called for pay-to-play, Section 5A, the Special Mandatory Conversion. The model charter's own preliminary note describes that provision as one under which "Preferred Stock investors are penalized if they fail to invest to a specified extent in certain future rounds of financing," with the penalty being conversion of some or all of the non-participating investor's Preferred Stock into Common Stock.
That pairing is the practical answer to a ratchet demand. An investor who wants full protection against a cheaper round should be willing to fund their share of it.
Common mistakes
- Arguing about the ratchet in the term sheet and then not reading the charter, where the sunset bracket and the waiver threshold actually get set.
- Forgetting that option grants and convertible securities can be deemed issuances under Section 4.4.3 and can trip the reset with no priced round at all.
- Leaving the Multiple Closing Dates window blank, so a tranched recapitalization ratchets twice.
- Assuming the ratchet only affects founders, when it dilutes every earlier series that lacks the same protection and the incoming investor too.
- Confusing a conversion price reset with a change in the liquidation preference; the preference is unchanged, only the as-converted share count moves.
How it relates to adjacent terms
Full ratchet is one end of the anti-dilution range whose other end is broad-based weighted average, and narrow-based weighted average sits between them by shrinking A in the formula so the same issuance produces a lower CP2. Its trigger is the down round, and its natural counterweight is pay-to-play, which conditions continued protection on writing another check.
Related tools and reading
Term Family
Further Reading
VC Term Sheet Template & Guide: Every Clause Explained with Examples
A clause-by-clause breakdown of every standard VC term sheet provision — what each term means, what's market, what to negotiate, and the red flags that cost founders millions.
NVCA Model Legal Documents: Every Form a Startup Founder Needs
The NVCA publishes free legal templates that can save you $10-30K in lawyer fees. Here's every document explained in plain English, plus what to watch for.
VC Interview Questions: 30 Questions They'll Actually Ask (With Answers)
30 real VC interview questions organized by category: technical, market thesis, deal evaluation, and behavioral. With frameworks for answering each one.
The Real Cost of Raising Venture Capital (Fees, Dilution, and Hidden Risks)
Most founders think raising $5M means getting $5M. It doesn't. Here's the real math on dilution, legal fees, time costs, and hidden terms that nobody warns you about.
What Is a Term Sheet? Definition, Format, and Sample Template
A term sheet is the foundational document in any VC deal. Learn the definition, format, key sections, and see a sample template to help you negotiate with confidence.
How to Negotiate a Term Sheet as a First-Time Founder
Your first term sheet is exciting and terrifying. Know what's negotiable, what's standard, and the practical tactics for pushing back on liquidation preferences, board seats, and protective provisions.
Related Guides
How to Negotiate a VC Term Sheet: A Founder's Leverage Guide
A founder's guide to negotiating VC term sheets: leverage mechanics, which terms actually matter, specific tactics, and real scenarios with concrete playbooks.
How to Read a Term Sheet: Line-by-Line Guide for Founders
Every major term sheet clause decoded: liquidation preference, board composition, anti-dilution, vesting, protective provisions, and more. With a negotiation priority list at the end.
Understanding Startup Equity and Dilution: A Complete Guide
How equity actually works, what dilution really means, and what founders take home in different exit scenarios. Real math, worked examples, no hand-waving.
Related Questions
What is a down round?
A down round is a funding round where a company raises capital at a lower valuation than its previous round. It dilutes existing shareholders and triggers anti-dilution provisions for preferred investors.
What is a term sheet in venture capital?
A term sheet is a non-binding document outlining the key terms and conditions of a proposed investment, serving as the basis for negotiating a final deal.
What is a term sheet?
A term sheet is a non-binding document that outlines the key terms of a proposed investment — valuation, amount, ownership percentage, and governance rights. It's the starting point for negotiating a deal.
What is anti-dilution protection in venture capital?
Anti-dilution protection adjusts an investor's share price downward if the company later raises money at a lower valuation, protecting the investor from being diluted by a down round.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Full Ratchet in venture capital?
Full ratchet is the most severe form of price-based anti-dilution protection. In the NVCA model Certificate of Incorporation, the full ratchet alternative to Section 4.4.
Why is Full Ratchet important for startups?
Understanding Full Ratchet is critical for founders navigating the fundraising process. It directly impacts deal terms, valuation, and the relationship between founders and investors.
What category does Full Ratchet fall under in VC?
Full Ratchet falls under the deal-terms category in venture capital. This area covers concepts related to the financial and legal terms that define investment agreements.
Sources & References
- 1.NVCA Model Certificate of Incorporation, 10-1-2025 (Sections 4.1.1, 4.4.1-4.4.6,National Venture Capital Association(Accessed 2026-09-20)
- 2.NVCA Model Legal Documents (document titles and update dates)National Venture Capital Association(Accessed 2026-09-20)
Newsletter
The VC Beast Brief
Fund operations, one problem a week — plus benchmarks from 75,000+ SEC filings. Every Tuesday.
The VC Beast Brief
The weekly brief for emerging managers and founders
Weekly intelligence on fundraising, VC strategy, and the signals that matter. Every Tuesday, free.
Related Tools
Archstone
Run your fund like an institution.