Skip to main content

2026 Comparison

Fund Administration Software Compared: 12 Platforms, Prices and Who Actually Uses Them

Written by Michael Kaufman · Reviewed against our editorial standards · Updated

Quick Answer

Fund administration software runs a fund's books: capital accounts, calls and distributions, the waterfall and LP reporting. The big split is software you operate versus an administrator who operates it for you, and top VC firms mostly hire administrators. Only 4 of the 12 platforms here publish a price. Our pick for emerging managers is Archstone, our own product, at a published $297/mo; larger funds should shortlist the quote-based platforms below.

Fund Administration Software Compared

Our pick first, labelled as ours; the other 11 follow in no ranked order. Prices are what each vendor publishes, linked to the page we read; “Quote-based” means nothing is published. The Form ADV column counts how many of the 81 VC Tech 100 firms that file name the vendor as their fund administrator, and on how many funds. A first-time manager should also read what a first fund actually needs.

Fund administration platforms compared on delivery model, fund types, sweet spot, published price, Form ADV administrator naming among VC Tech 100 firms, LP portal and date verified.
PlatformDeliveryFund typesSweet spotPublished priceNamed as administrator in Form ADV (VC Tech 100)LP portalLast verified
ArchstoneTop PickOur productSoftwareVC and sponsor fundsFund I to Fund III, emerging managers$297/mo Starter, $497/mo Pron/a, software onlyYes2026-10-02
CartaSoftware plus administrationNot verifiedManagers already on its cap table and SPV productsNot verified4 firms / 46 fundsNot verifiedNot verified
Juniper SquareSoftware plus administrationVC, PE, credit, real estateMulti-fund GPs with institutional LP basesQuote-based2 firms / 69 fundsYes2026-10-02
AllvueSoftwarePE, creditMulti-fund PE and credit managers, and administratorsQuote-basedn/a, software onlyYes2026-10-02
FIS Private Capital Suite (Investran)SoftwarePEInstitutional PE and fund-of-fundsQuote-basedn/a, software onlyYes2026-10-02
SS&CAdministration plus technologyPE, private credit, hedgeLarge and multi-strategy fund familiesQuote-based2 firms / 23 fundsNot stated2026-10-02
Show all 12 platforms
Fund administration platforms 7 to 12.
PlatformDeliveryFund typesSweet spotPublished priceNamed as administrator in Form ADV (VC Tech 100)LP portalLast verified
eFront (BlackRock)SoftwarePE, VC, private credit, real estateInstitutional GPs, LPs and asset servicersQuote-basedn/a, software onlyYes2026-10-02
FundCountSoftwarePE, hedge, family offices, administratorsFirms that want partnership accounting and the GL in one systemFrom $38,389/yr (Private Equity); from $26,950/yr (Fund Administration)n/a, software onlyInvestor reports; portal not stated2026-10-02
LemonEdgeSoftwareVC, PE, real estate, fund of fundsFirms and administrators that want a configurable accounting engineQuote-basedn/a, software onlyYes2026-10-02
FlowSoftwareVC, PE, real estateEmerging managers who want onboarding, data room and portal in oneQuote-basedn/a, software onlyYes2026-10-02
FundwaveSoftwareVC, PESingle funds up to $250M wanting published per-fund pricingFrom $800/mo per fund (Seed), $1,200 (Growth), $1,800 (Enterprise); onboarding fee extran/a, software onlySeparate product, sold in bundles2026-10-02
AngelListSoftware-enabled administrationVC funds, rolling funds, SPVsVenture funds that want one provider for admin and tax0.1% of fund size + $10K/yr (Institutional); 0.15% + $20K/yr (Full Service)Not namedYes2026-10-02

Software or an Administrator? What the SEC Filings Show

Of the 81 VC Tech 100 firms that report private funds on Form ADV, 56 name an outside administrator and 25 administer in-house; the most-named are Standish Management (14 firms, 288 funds) and Aduro Advisors (13 firms, 206 funds), both services firms rather than software vendors.

The filings show what top venture firms actually do: most hire a services firm to keep the books, the largest and oldest administer in-house, and software vendors appear as the named administrator at only a handful. Who those fund administration companies are, how the pattern changes with the number of funds, and what they cost is on our page on Venture Capital Fund Administration: who administers VC funds.

That is why the useful first question is not which product but which model. Software you operate keeps the work and the cost inside the firm; you or a fractional controller run the books and still need a CPA and an auditor. Software plus administration is a vendor that runs the books for you on its own platform. A services administrator is a team, often working on one of the platforms in this table, because Allvue, eFront, FundCount and LemonEdge all sell Software for Fund Administrators as well as for GPs.

Three thresholds decide it. Capacity: software only saves money if someone named will run quarter end. Credibility: when an anchor LP asks for an independent administrator, cost stops deciding. Complexity: parallel vehicles, SPVs and side letters, not AUM, are what push a fund past what one operator can carry. The cost side, with every published rate card and the quote bands for service, is on the fund administration pricing benchmark.

Why Archstone Is Our Pick for Emerging Managers

Archstone is our own product, so weigh this section accordingly. It is the pick for a first, second or third venture or sponsor fund because it covers what those funds need at a price you can read before a sales call: per-LP capital accounts, capital call and distribution notices, waterfall math across funds and SPVs, K-1 distribution and an LP portal, on $297/mo Starter, $497/mo Pro. Starter covers up to 25 LPs and 2 funds; Pro removes the LP limit and covers 3 funds; no per-seat charges. Setup takes days, not a professional-services engagement.

What it is not: an administrator. It does not keep your books for you, and as software it has no Form ADV column. Once an institutional LP wants an independent administrator, or the fund family reaches multiple entities with offshore feeders, the quote-based platforms and administrators in the table are the better answer, and we say so. Head-to-heads: vs Juniper Square, vs Allvue, vs Carta.

See the published pricing →

The 11 Other Fund Administration Platforms

The same five things for each: who it is for, how it is delivered, what drives the price, what the vendor states about itself, and where it stops. These are fund administration systems at very different scales, so read the sweet spot before the feature list.

Carta

Software plus administration · Not verified · Form ADV: 4 firms / 46 funds

Who it is for. Venture managers whose portfolio companies, SPVs or cap tables already run on the same vendor, and who want fund administration from the provider they already use. It is one of the few software companies that top venture firms name as their administrator in SEC filings, which is the column in the table above.

Delivery. Software plus a managed administration service: the vendor keeps the books on its own platform and issues statements to your LPs, rather than handing you a tool to operate.

Price. No published rate card was readable on the check date. Expect a quote driven by fund size, number of entities and SPVs, and which tax and valuation services are bundled.

Evidence. Carta's site refused our fetches on the check date, so no cell in its row is carried over from an older read. Source. In Form ADV, 4 VC Tech 100 firms name it as administrator, on 46 funds.

Limits. The site refused every fetch on the check date, so its fund types and portal cells are marked not verified rather than carried over from an older read. Ask in the demo how many venture funds of your size it administers, and what changes in service when you add a parallel vehicle.

Juniper Square

Software plus administration · Quote-based · Form ADV: 2 firms / 69 funds

Who it is for. GPs with an institutional LP base who want investor relations, the investor portal and fund administration from one vendor. It covers venture, private equity, credit and real estate, and its venture page sells institutional administration for venture funds.

Delivery. Software plus administration. The investor-management platform is the product most people know; the administration service is sold alongside it, so you can buy the system, the service or both.

Price. Quote-based. Its old pricing URL now redirects to the homepage, and no rate is published. Quotes scale with entities, LPs and which modules you take.

Evidence. 2,300+ GPs, 750,000+ LPs and 45,000+ investment entities on the platform (homepage). Source. In Form ADV, 2 VC Tech 100 firms name it as administrator, on 69 funds.

Limits. Strongest where the LP experience is the priority; for a single small fund the implementation can be more than the job needs. Ask whether the portal is priced separately from administration, and what the administration team's venture caseload looks like.

Allvue

Software · Quote-based · Form ADV: n/a, software only

Who it is for. Multi-fund private equity and credit managers that run fund accounting in-house, and the administrators that serve them. It is enterprise software rather than a service: your controller or your administrator operates it.

Delivery. Software. Allvue sells to GPs and markets a dedicated product line to fund administrators, so it often sits underneath an outsourced administrator rather than replacing one.

Price. Quote-based, through an enterprise sales process. Expect pricing tied to modules, entities and users, plus implementation.

Evidence. $8.5T+ in assets tracked and 500+ clients served globally (homepage). Source.

Limits. Its pages lead with private equity and credit, not venture. A small venture fund buys depth it will not use for years. The investor portal reads straight from Allvue's fund accounting, which is the point and also the dependency.

FIS Private Capital Suite (Investran)

Software · Quote-based · Form ADV: n/a, software only

Who it is for. Institutional private equity firms, fund-of-funds and large LPs that need deep partnership accounting and reporting across many entities. Investran is the long-standing institutional system in this category.

Delivery. Software. The suite covers fund and partnership accounting, investor commitments, calls and distributions, with a branded investor portal (Digital Data Exchange).

Price. Quote-based. No price is published on the product page.

Evidence. A unified platform for fund and partnership accounting, with a branded investor portal (Digital Data Exchange). Source.

Limits. Built for scale, and priced and implemented that way. Plan for a long implementation and a dedicated owner inside the firm. Our direct fetch was blocked; the cells come from a second read of the same product page on the check date.

SS&C

Administration plus technology · Quote-based · Form ADV: 2 firms / 23 funds

Who it is for. Large and multi-strategy fund families that want an administrator with its own technology, across private equity, private credit and hedge structures. It is the one row here that is primarily a service.

Delivery. Administration plus technology. SS&C runs the administration and owns much of the software it runs it on, so the buyer is choosing a provider, not a tool.

Price. Quote-based. As an administrator it prices the service: basis points or retainers with minimums, sized to the structure.

Evidence. Describes itself as the largest global fund administrator, serving start-ups through the largest funds. Source. In Form ADV, 2 VC Tech 100 firms name it as administrator, on 23 funds.

Limits. Its own page says it serves start-ups to the largest funds, but in the filings it appears at a handful of top venture firms only. For a first venture fund, a boutique specialist is usually the more natural fit.

eFront (BlackRock)

Software · Quote-based · Form ADV: n/a, software only

Who it is for. Institutional GPs, LPs and the asset servicers that administer for them, across private equity, private credit, real estate and venture. Owned by BlackRock and part of its Aladdin ecosystem.

Delivery. Software, sold both to managers and to fund administrators, with investor portals as a separate product line.

Price. Quote-based. No price is published.

Evidence. Fund administration and accounting software sold to GPs and to asset servicers and fund administrators. Source.

Limits. An enterprise system with an enterprise footprint. Its strength is that administrators and managers can work in the same system; its cost is that a small manager is buying into a platform designed around large ones.

FundCount

Software · From $38,389/yr (Private Equity); from $26,950/yr (Fund Administration) · Form ADV: n/a, software only

Who it is for. Firms that want partnership accounting, investment accounting and the general ledger in one system: private equity, hedge funds, family offices, and small administrators starting their first clients.

Delivery. Software, deployable on-site, in a private or public cloud, or as managed SaaS. The firm or its administrator operates it.

Price. One of the few vendors with published starting prices: the Private Equity solution starts at $38,389 a year and the Fund Administration solution at $26,950, plus implementation and hosting fees scoped in the quote. A Fund Admin Incubator tier starts lower for administrators with up to five funds.

Evidence. Annual starting prices published per solution, plus implementation and hosting fees scoped in the quote. Source.

Limits. It is an accounting platform first. The LP-facing side is investor and client reporting rather than a portal-first experience, so check what your LPs will log into. It also ranks itself first in its own category listicle, which is worth knowing when you read it.

LemonEdge

Software · Quote-based · Form ADV: n/a, software only

Who it is for. Venture, private equity and real estate managers, and administrators, who want a configurable accounting engine they can automate through an API rather than a fixed workflow.

Delivery. Software. It markets venture capital accounting software built with venture firms, plus a white-labelled investor portal.

Price. Quote-based. It publishes no pricing page; the old pricing URL returns a 404.

Evidence. Accounting and reporting software with an API for automations and a white-labelled investor portal. Source.

Limits. Configurability is the strength and the cost: someone has to configure it. Without an in-house controller or an administrator already on LemonEdge, budget for implementation help.

Flow

Software · Quote-based · Form ADV: n/a, software only

Who it is for. Emerging venture and private equity managers who want investor onboarding, a data room and an investor portal in one product, and who run SPVs alongside the fund.

Delivery. Software, with administration services offered for SPVs. For the main fund, the accounting itself may still sit with an administrator or a controller.

Price. Quote-based. The site publishes no pricing page.

Evidence. Data room, investor onboarding and investor portal; SPVs with software and administration services. Source.

Limits. Its centre of gravity is the investor experience: onboarding, documents and portal. Confirm how deep the fund accounting goes, and who produces capital account statements, before treating it as the system of record.

Fundwave

Software · From $800/mo per fund (Seed), $1,200 (Growth), $1,800 (Enterprise); onboarding fee extra · Form ADV: n/a, software only

Who it is for. Single funds and small fund families up to a few hundred million dollars that want to read the price before the demo.

Delivery. Software, priced per fund. A fund administration service is sold as an add-on, and the investor portal is a separate product sold in bundles.

Price. Published: Fund Admin Seed starts at $800 a month per fund for funds up to $50M, Growth at $1,200 for up to $250M with carried interest calculations, and Enterprise from $1,800. Each requires a one-time onboarding fee, from $2,000 on Seed.

Evidence. Seed covers one fund up to $50M AUM and requires a one-time $2,000 onboarding fee; fund admin services are an add-on. Source.

Limits. Per-fund pricing adds up for a manager with several vehicles and SPVs. The portal and portfolio modules cost extra unless bought in a bundle, so price the bundle you will actually use.

AngelList

Software-enabled administration · 0.1% of fund size + $10K/yr (Institutional); 0.15% + $20K/yr (Full Service) · Form ADV: Not named

Who it is for. Venture funds, rolling funds and syndicate-shaped vehicles that want administration, tax and K-1s from one provider with a published formula.

Delivery. Software-enabled administration: AngelList runs the back office on its own platform. The Full Service plan includes fund taxes and K-1 preparation.

Price. Published as a formula: 0.1% of fund size plus $10,000 a year on Institutional, and 0.15% plus $20,000 on Full Service, both subject to a minimum fund size and a one-time implementation fee.

Evidence. Both plans subject to a minimum fund size plus a one-time implementation fee based on fund complexity. Source.

Limits. A formula behaves nothing like a flat fee as the fund grows: at 0.15% plus the fixed fee, a $50M fund pays $95,000 a year. Model it at your target fund size, not your first close.

How to Choose Fund Administration Software by Fund Size

The question has four answers, and the vendor sets at the two ends barely overlap. What changes between them is who is responsible for the numbers and what your LPs expect to see, not feature preference.

Fund administration software by fund size: typical platform, typical cost and the trigger to move up a band.
BandTypical platformTypical costTrigger to move up
Fund I under $25MSoftware you operate, on a published price: our pick, or AngelList if the vehicle is syndicate-shaped.Hundreds of dollars a month for published software; formula pricing for platform administration.An anchor LP asks for an independent administrator, or a second close adds equalisation.
$25M to $100MSoftware plus a quarter-end review, or a boutique administrator; a software-plus-administration vendor if one provider for portal and books matters.Low five figures a year for published per-fund software; quotes for service.An audit, multiple closes, side letters or more than about 15 LPs.
$100M to $250MJuniper Square for the LP experience, Allvue or eFront where accounting complexity leads, usually with an administrator.Quote-based across the board, sized to entity count.Parallel vehicles, SPV programmes and SOC 2 questions in diligence.
$250M and above, or multi-entityAn outsourced administrator, with Investran, Allvue or eFront in-house for reporting and control.Quote-based; the administrator's fee, not the software licence, dominates.Offshore feeders, non-US LPs, Form PF and multi-jurisdiction filings.

Entity count drives cost and complexity more than AUM: a $40M fund running six SPVs is a harder administration problem than a $150M single-vehicle fund, and every quote-based provider prices it that way. The band you sign in is not the band you renew in, so ask what happens to the fee and the service when you add a parallel vehicle, a second close or a non-US LP. The Fund I to Fund III path is walked through in how to choose a fund administrator.

Fund Admin for Emerging Managers: What a First Fund Actually Needs

A first fund is sold complexity it will not use for years. The requirement is short: capital call notices, per-LP capital accounts, a whole-fund waterfall, quarterly statements and a document store LPs can log into. Multi-currency, deal-by-deal carry with clawback, custodian integrations and data warehousing are what make enterprise platforms expensive and slow, and buying them for a Fund I means paying for scale you will not reach before Fund III. When a demo drifts, ask what the feature would do on your fund this quarter; if the answer is in the future tense, it is not a requirement yet.

Below roughly $25M with fewer than 15 LPs, running administration yourself on software is normal and defensible. Between $25M and $50M the LP base decides: one institutional anchor asking for independence settles it. Many sub-$100M funds run a hybrid: software day to day, with an administrator or fund CFO engaged for quarter-end review, the audit and K-1 season. Three things get recommended as fund administration and are not:

  • ›Passthrough and Anduin: subscription documents and investor onboarding. They get LPs into the fund; they do not keep its books.
  • ›Visible.vc: investor updates and portfolio monitoring, not a fund accounting system: no capital accounts, no NAV, no waterfall.
  • ›A spreadsheet plus an automation tool: workable for a handful of investments, then dangerous, because its errors are waterfall errors about who is owed money.

How We Compared Them

Every row was re-read on October 2, 2026 from the vendor page linked in the table and in the sources below. A price appears only where the vendor publishes it; otherwise the cell says quote-based, and where a site refused every fetch the row says not verified rather than repeating an older figure. The Form ADV column is computed at build from Question 26 of Schedule D Section 7.B.(1) for the VC Tech 100 panel, collected September 21, 2026; it counts firms and funds per vendor and never names which firm uses which. The rubric below is how we weighed the platforms against each other for the shortlist by fund size.

How we scored this

We score for VC and PE firms choosing fund administration software, from emerging managers to institutional fund families. Platforms built for a different buyer are rated against that lens, where they may intentionally score lower — a statement of fit, not a knock on quality. These are editorial judgments based on public pricing and documented features as of October 2, 2026; they are not paid placements, and no rating reflects aggregated user reviews.

  • 25%

    Fund accounting & waterfall

    NAV, capital accounts, distributions, and carry/waterfall math correct out of the box.

  • 20%

    LP portal & reporting

    Quality of the LP-facing portal, quarterly statements and investor communications.

  • 15%

    Capital calls & distributions

    Automated notices, drawdown tracking and distribution processing.

  • 15%

    Price & cost transparency

    Published, predictable pricing and total cost of ownership relative to fund size.

  • 10%

    Implementation & onboarding

    Time to live and the size of the professional-services engagement required.

  • 10%

    Enterprise scale & complexity

    Multi-fund, multi-currency and complex-structure support, where enterprise platforms win by design.

  • 5%

    Tax & compliance

    K-1 coordination, regulatory reporting and audit-trail depth.

Fund Administration Software vs Fund Accounting Software

Fund accounting is a subset of fund administration. Accounting software keeps the books: positions, valuations, capital accounts, calls and distributions. Administration software adds what surrounds the ledger: investor onboarding and AML checks, notices, LP reporting and portals, tax coordination and audit support. A platform can be excellent at the first and absent on the second, which is fine as long as you know which one you bought. FundCount and Allvue lead with accounting; Juniper Square, AngelList and Fundwave lead with administration. The ledger end has its own comparison in fund accounting software, and how Venture Capital Fund Administration differs from Private Equity Fund Administration is set out on the administration page.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who are the best fund admins for venture capital funds?

It depends on whether you want a service or software. For a service, the SEC filings answer it: among top venture firms, Standish Management and Aduro Advisors are the two most-named administrators by a wide margin, and the full table is on our venture capital fund administration page. For software you operate, the pick on this page is named in the answer box at the top, with our ownership disclosed, and Juniper Square and Carta sell software and administration together.

What fund admin tools do top VC firms use?

Mostly people, not tools. In the Form ADV filings of the VC Tech 100, most firms that report private funds name an outside administrator, usually a services firm such as Standish Management or Aduro Advisors, and the largest, oldest firms administer in-house with their own finance teams. Software companies appear as administrators at a handful of firms, Carta and Juniper Square among them. The comparison table on this page carries that count for each vendor that also administers.

What private market platform offers fund administration tools for SPVs including waterfall, fees, and distributions?

Waterfalls, management fees and distributions calculated per vehicle are the test that separates fund administration from bookkeeping. AngelList and Carta both administer SPVs on their own platforms, Flow sells SPV administration alongside its software, and Juniper Square and Allvue handle multi-entity structures at larger scale on a quote. The pick named above covers funds and SPVs in one subscription. If you run many single-asset SPVs, compare per-entity pricing first, because that is where an SPV programme's cost shows up.

What is fund administration software?

Software that runs a private fund's back office: per-LP capital accounts, capital calls and distributions, management fees and the carry waterfall, NAV and fair-value support, K-1 coordination, and an investor portal for statements and documents. Some vendors sell only the software, which you or your controller operate; others run the administration for you on their own platform. Which of the two you are buying matters more than any feature list.

How is fund administration software different from fund accounting software?

Fund accounting software is the ledger: positions, valuations, capital accounts, calls and distributions. Fund administration software adds the work around the ledger: investor onboarding and AML checks, notices, LP reporting and portals, tax coordination and audit support. FundCount and Allvue are accounting-led; Juniper Square, AngelList and Fundwave lean toward administration. Our fund accounting software comparison covers the ledger end in its own right.

Which fund administration software is best for venture capital funds?

For an emerging venture manager running Fund I to Fund III, our pick is Archstone, our own product: capital accounts, calls, distributions, waterfall math and an LP portal on a published monthly price, live in days. Once a fund passes roughly $100M or adds multiple entities, most venture firms hire an administrator and keep software for reporting. For venture funds with institutional LPs, Juniper Square sells software and administration together, and managers already on Carta for cap tables and SPVs can buy administration there.

How much does fund administration software cost?

Most vendors do not say. Of the 12 platforms compared here, 4 publish a price: flat monthly software from a few hundred dollars a month, Fundwave from $800 a month per fund, FundCount from $26,950 a year for its fund administration solution, and AngelList's formula of a percentage of fund size plus a fixed fee. The rest are quote-based and scale with entities, LPs and modules. Outsourced administration is a separate cost, covered on our pricing benchmark.

Do I need fund administration software if I use an outsourced administrator?

Often not for the books, because the administrator keeps them on its own system. Many firms still buy software for what the administrator does not do: the LP portal and investor relations, portfolio monitoring, and a shadow view of the numbers so the GP can check the administrator's work. Ask your administrator what its portal and reports cover before buying a second system for the same job.

Which fund administrators do top VC firms use?

In the VC Tech 100's Form ADV filings, Standish Management is named by 14 firms and Aduro Advisors by 13, far ahead of any other name, while 25 of the 81 filers administer in-house. 30 administrator names appear in total. The full aggregate table, with fund counts and the in-house group, is on our venture capital fund administration page.

What should a fund admin software demo show?

Your fund, not theirs. Ask the vendor to run a mock capital call and a mock quarter end on your structure: a per-LP capital account statement, a distribution through your LPA's waterfall, management fee accrual with any offsets, and what an LP sees in the portal. Then ask for the audit trail behind one capital account entry, and what changes in price and service when you add a parallel vehicle or an SPV.

Is VC Beast independent from Archstone?

No. VC Beast and Archstone share common ownership: the same founder operates both. That is why Archstone is labelled as ours wherever it appears, why it is the pick only for emerging managers, and why the page publishes its rubric, its sources and the date every price was checked. Every other platform is described from its own vendor pages, and the Form ADV column comes from SEC filings no vendor pays to appear in.

Who offers the best fund administration?

There is no single best provider, only the best fit for your fund size and structure. Among top venture firms, the filings show two boutique administrators named far more often than anyone else; among software, Juniper Square leads on LP experience and Allvue, Investran and eFront on institutional depth. Ask every provider for a line-item fee schedule covering NAV frequency, calls, K-1s, implementation and per-entity charges, because the headline number hides most of the difference.

What's the best fund administration software for a venture debt fund?

A venture debt fund needs interest accrual, amortisation schedules and borrower-level tracking on top of ordinary fund accounting, which is a credit workflow rather than an equity one. Allvue and SS&C are built around private credit, and Investran and eFront cover multi-strategy structures. Platforms built around venture equity workflows, including the pick named above, should be checked for loan-level accounting before you shortlist them. The test is whether the system models a loan as a position with a schedule or as a line item.

Sources & References

  1. 1.Archstone (shares ownership with VC Beast): pricing(Price and row cells as fetched 2026-10-02)
  2. 2.Carta: vendor page(Site refused our fetch on 2026-10-02; row marked not verified)
  3. 3.Juniper Square: vendor page(Price and row cells as fetched 2026-10-02)
  4. 4.Allvue: vendor page(Price and row cells as fetched 2026-10-02)
  5. 5.FIS Private Capital Suite (Investran): vendor page(Price and row cells as fetched 2026-10-02)
  6. 6.SS&C: vendor page(Price and row cells as fetched 2026-10-02)
  7. 7.eFront (BlackRock): vendor page(Price and row cells as fetched 2026-10-02)
  8. 8.FundCount: vendor page(Price and row cells as fetched 2026-10-02)
  9. 9.LemonEdge: vendor page(Price and row cells as fetched 2026-10-02)
  10. 10.Flow: vendor page(Price and row cells as fetched 2026-10-02)
  11. 11.Fundwave: vendor page(Price and row cells as fetched 2026-10-02)
  12. 12.AngelList: vendor page(Price and row cells as fetched 2026-10-02)
  13. 13.Juniper Square: pricing(Published price, or its absence, as fetched 2026-10-02)
  14. 14.Allvue: pricing(Published price, or its absence, as fetched 2026-10-02)
  15. 15.LemonEdge: pricing(Published price, or its absence, as fetched 2026-10-02)
  16. 16.SEC Form ADV Part 1A, Schedule D Section 7.B.(1), Question 26: VC Tech 100 administrator disclosures(Form ADV column, collected 2026-09-21 from filings dated 2024-02-12 to 2026-09-14)

Terms On This Page

Choosing an administrator means comparing who runs these functions for you, and how well.